<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 750 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210952</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the rejection of the conversion of shipping bills from the DEPB scheme to the DEEC scheme due to the lack of a clear finding by the Commissioner, absence of principles of natural justice, and the non-speaking nature of the order. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for a fresh decision, directing the Commissioner to allow the exporter to present all documentary evidence and specify the total duty involved in the shipping bills within four months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 750 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210952</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the rejection of the conversion of shipping bills from the DEPB scheme to the DEEC scheme due to the lack of a clear finding by the Commissioner, absence of principles of natural justice, and the non-speaking nature of the order. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner for a fresh decision, directing the Commissioner to allow the exporter to present all documentary evidence and specify the total duty involved in the shipping bills within four months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>