https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210944 The Tribunal in Appeal No. E/2918-2919/09 directed verification for the adjustment of duty amount paid against the demanded amount, acknowledging the dispute. In Appeal No. E/2932-2933/2009, the Tribunal confirmed duty liability for impugned goods seized from the appellants' premises, with no reduction, but directed consideration for adjusting part payment against the demand. Regarding penalties, the Tribunal reduced penalties for certain appellants based on proportionality to the value of seized goods, emphasizing fairness in penalty imposition. en-us Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210944 The Tribunal in Appeal No. E/2918-2919/09 directed verification for the adjustment of duty amount paid against the demanded amount, acknowledging the dispute. In Appeal No. E/2932-2933/2009, the Tribunal confirmed duty liability for impugned goods seized from the appellants' premises, with no reduction, but directed consideration for adjusting part payment against the demand. Regarding penalties, the Tribunal reduced penalties for certain appellants based on proportionality to the value of seized goods, emphasizing fairness in penalty imposition. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210944