<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1208 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210942</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Revisionary Authority for a fresh decision, considering the observations made. The petitioner was directed to appear before the Revisionary Authority on 7th March 2011, and the matter was to be decided expeditiously within four months. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1208 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210942</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Revisionary Authority for a fresh decision, considering the observations made. The petitioner was directed to appear before the Revisionary Authority on 7th March 2011, and the matter was to be decided expeditiously within four months. The writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>