<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1133 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210941</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the penalties imposed for short payment of duties based on the re-determination of duty liabilities under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The judgment emphasized the unforeseeable nature of the short-levy arising from delayed re-determination and the lack of intent to evade payment, leading to the decision to not sustain the penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1133 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210941</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the penalties imposed for short payment of duties based on the re-determination of duty liabilities under Section 3A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The judgment emphasized the unforeseeable nature of the short-levy arising from delayed re-determination and the lack of intent to evade payment, leading to the decision to not sustain the penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>