<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 367 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210939</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, remitted the dispute back to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh adjudication to determine whether the activity constituted repair and maintenance or industrial and commercial construction. The Authority was directed to thoroughly analyze the work order, consider previous judgments on the levy of service tax on works contracts, and issue a reasoned order after examining all appellant submissions and evidence. The appellant was required to appear before the Authority within a month for a hearing. The stay application and appeal were disposed of to ensure a comprehensive re-adjudication based on legal precedents and relevant considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 367 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210939</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, remitted the dispute back to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh adjudication to determine whether the activity constituted repair and maintenance or industrial and commercial construction. The Authority was directed to thoroughly analyze the work order, consider previous judgments on the levy of service tax on works contracts, and issue a reasoned order after examining all appellant submissions and evidence. The appellant was required to appear before the Authority within a month for a hearing. The stay application and appeal were disposed of to ensure a comprehensive re-adjudication based on legal precedents and relevant considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>