<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 361 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210933</link>
    <description>The Court admitted the winding-up application, ordering the Company to pay Rs.1,62,75,293.25 along with interest and overdue service charges. The Company was granted the opportunity to pay in installments, failing which the petitioner could publish the winding-up notice. The Court found the petitioner&#039;s claim valid, rejecting the Company&#039;s defense as not bona fide, emphasizing that the charges were in accordance with the contract terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 361 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210933</link>
      <description>The Court admitted the winding-up application, ordering the Company to pay Rs.1,62,75,293.25 along with interest and overdue service charges. The Company was granted the opportunity to pay in installments, failing which the petitioner could publish the winding-up notice. The Court found the petitioner&#039;s claim valid, rejecting the Company&#039;s defense as not bona fide, emphasizing that the charges were in accordance with the contract terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>