<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 350 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210921</link>
    <description>The Court directed the petitioner to pay a specific sum related to the tax demand within eight weeks as per the impugned order. The third respondent was instructed to review and decide on the appeal within twelve weeks. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 350 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210921</link>
      <description>The Court directed the petitioner to pay a specific sum related to the tax demand within eight weeks as per the impugned order. The third respondent was instructed to review and decide on the appeal within twelve weeks. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>