<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 739 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210906</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals regarding service tax demands for services from goods transport operators during a specific period, finding that show-cause notices issued before a certain amendment were not valid. The decision highlighted the significance of considering amended provisions of the Finance Act in evaluating the legality of such demands, ultimately ruling that the demands were not legally valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 739 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210906</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals regarding service tax demands for services from goods transport operators during a specific period, finding that show-cause notices issued before a certain amendment were not valid. The decision highlighted the significance of considering amended provisions of the Finance Act in evaluating the legality of such demands, ultimately ruling that the demands were not legally valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>