https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210904 The court admitted the winding up application against the company due to the absence of a valid defense. Despite the company's contentions of unauthorized bills and excess payments, the court found discrepancies in their claims and highlighted the continuous part payments made until 2009. Emphasizing the lack of substantial evidence to refute the petitioning-creditor's claim, the court noted the company's defense lacked commercial morality, justifying the admission of the winding up application. en-us Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210904 The court admitted the winding up application against the company due to the absence of a valid defense. Despite the company's contentions of unauthorized bills and excess payments, the court found discrepancies in their claims and highlighted the continuous part payments made until 2009. Emphasizing the lack of substantial evidence to refute the petitioning-creditor's claim, the court noted the company's defense lacked commercial morality, justifying the admission of the winding up application. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210904