https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210902 Candidates who had cleared the written examination under the earlier customs house agents licensing regime could not be denied the certificate because the oral examination was postponed until revised regulations came into force. The court treated substantial completion of the selection process under the earlier regime as decisive, and held that the later procedural change could not retrospectively defeat that position. It also noted that similarly placed candidates had already been granted the same relief, so withholding the certificate would amount to discriminatory treatment. On that basis, entitlement to the certificate under Regulation 8 was affirmed and the challenge to the writ court's direction failed. en-us Mon, 26 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210902 Candidates who had cleared the written examination under the earlier customs house agents licensing regime could not be denied the certificate because the oral examination was postponed until revised regulations came into force. The court treated substantial completion of the selection process under the earlier regime as decisive, and held that the later procedural change could not retrospectively defeat that position. It also noted that similarly placed candidates had already been granted the same relief, so withholding the certificate would amount to discriminatory treatment. On that basis, entitlement to the certificate under Regulation 8 was affirmed and the challenge to the writ court's direction failed. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 26 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210902