<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 322 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210885</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that Section 40(a)(ia) did not apply to conversion and administrative charges, rejected the disallowance under Section 40A(2), and remanded the issues of disallowance under Section 40A(2) and bad debts under Section 36(1)(vii) for further examination by the CIT(A). The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184312" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 322 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210885</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision that Section 40(a)(ia) did not apply to conversion and administrative charges, rejected the disallowance under Section 40A(2), and remanded the issues of disallowance under Section 40A(2) and bad debts under Section 36(1)(vii) for further examination by the CIT(A). The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>