<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1365 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210876</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and confirming the assessee&#039;s status as a partnership firm for the assessment year 1993-94 under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The reconstructed paper-book was accepted after a fire incident, and substantial questions of law regarding the partnership deed and compliance with tax provisions were considered. The Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowances were overturned, and the assessee&#039;s deductions were allowed. The court upheld the assessee&#039;s partnership firm status, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments, and dismissed the appeals based on this determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1365 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210876</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the Commissioner&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal and confirming the assessee&#039;s status as a partnership firm for the assessment year 1993-94 under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The reconstructed paper-book was accepted after a fire incident, and substantial questions of law regarding the partnership deed and compliance with tax provisions were considered. The Assessing Officer&#039;s disallowances were overturned, and the assessee&#039;s deductions were allowed. The court upheld the assessee&#039;s partnership firm status, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments, and dismissed the appeals based on this determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>