<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 382 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210864</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld substantial demands and penalties against the appellants, private limited companies, and a director for undervaluation in fabric imports. Despite financial hardship claims, the Tribunal found evidence of undervaluation, discrepancies in invoiced values, and questionable practices. It acknowledged a partial deposit made by one appellant but directed specific deposit amounts for each appellant, waiving pre-deposit for the remaining duties and penalties subject to compliance within a specified timeline. Failure to comply would result in appeal dismissal without further notice, with a compliance reporting date set for 13-10-2008.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 382 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210864</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld substantial demands and penalties against the appellants, private limited companies, and a director for undervaluation in fabric imports. Despite financial hardship claims, the Tribunal found evidence of undervaluation, discrepancies in invoiced values, and questionable practices. It acknowledged a partial deposit made by one appellant but directed specific deposit amounts for each appellant, waiving pre-deposit for the remaining duties and penalties subject to compliance within a specified timeline. Failure to comply would result in appeal dismissal without further notice, with a compliance reporting date set for 13-10-2008.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210864</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>