<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 715 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210835</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the appeal, holding that the reassessment could not be sustained where reasons recorded for reopening were not furnished to the assessee before completion of the assessment. Even though the reopening fell within the three-year period, failure to provide the reasons prior to finalizing assessment invalidated the reassessment, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2025 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 715 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210835</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the appeal, holding that the reassessment could not be sustained where reasons recorded for reopening were not furnished to the assessee before completion of the assessment. Even though the reopening fell within the three-year period, failure to provide the reasons prior to finalizing assessment invalidated the reassessment, and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>