<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1039 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210830</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by a Cooperative Society under relevant sections of the Central Excise Act and the Finance Act. The appellant&#039;s claim of being unaware of the 2006 order was rejected, leading to the appeal being deemed time-barred. The Court found the appellant&#039;s lack of response during assessment proceedings and failure to attend hearings as indications of negligence. Referring to precedent, the Court held that the appeal period cannot be extended beyond the statutory limit. The Tribunal affirmed the dismissal, concluding that the appellant&#039;s conduct did not justify condonation of delay, resulting in the appeal being hopelessly time-barred and ultimately dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1039 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210830</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by a Cooperative Society under relevant sections of the Central Excise Act and the Finance Act. The appellant&#039;s claim of being unaware of the 2006 order was rejected, leading to the appeal being deemed time-barred. The Court found the appellant&#039;s lack of response during assessment proceedings and failure to attend hearings as indications of negligence. Referring to precedent, the Court held that the appeal period cannot be extended beyond the statutory limit. The Tribunal affirmed the dismissal, concluding that the appellant&#039;s conduct did not justify condonation of delay, resulting in the appeal being hopelessly time-barred and ultimately dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>