<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 258 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210828</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the income from the three agreements, constituting a hostel business, should be classified as business income rather than income from house property. The entire income, after deducting expenses, was considered business income. However, the claim for pre-construction interest deduction was disallowed as it did not align with the provisions for business income. The appeals for both assessment years were allowed in favor of the assessee, with the exception of the pre-construction interest issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 258 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210828</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the income from the three agreements, constituting a hostel business, should be classified as business income rather than income from house property. The entire income, after deducting expenses, was considered business income. However, the claim for pre-construction interest deduction was disallowed as it did not align with the provisions for business income. The appeals for both assessment years were allowed in favor of the assessee, with the exception of the pre-construction interest issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>