<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 292 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210826</link>
    <description>Declared transaction value could not be substituted in customs valuation merely on a mechanical basis where the first appellate authority had already examined the matter under the Customs Valuation (Determination of Price of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007 and recorded reasons. In the absence of documentary support or other cogent material to justify disturbing the declared value, the proposed reassessment was not sustainable. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, and the declared transaction value was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 292 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210826</link>
      <description>Declared transaction value could not be substituted in customs valuation merely on a mechanical basis where the first appellate authority had already examined the matter under the Customs Valuation (Determination of Price of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007 and recorded reasons. In the absence of documentary support or other cogent material to justify disturbing the declared value, the proposed reassessment was not sustainable. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected, and the declared transaction value was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210826</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>