<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 522 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210822</link>
    <description>The Tribunal and High Court ruled in favor of the importer in a customs case involving the interpretation of Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962. The goods were not subject to confiscation as duty had been paid, and export obligations were fulfilled, rendering post-export conditions irrelevant. The Commissioner&#039;s authority was limited to cases exceeding license limits, and the Tribunal&#039;s decisions were upheld regarding jurisdiction and estoppel principles. Consequently, fines and penalties under Sections 111(o) and 112(a) were set aside, and the civil miscellaneous appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 522 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210822</link>
      <description>The Tribunal and High Court ruled in favor of the importer in a customs case involving the interpretation of Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962. The goods were not subject to confiscation as duty had been paid, and export obligations were fulfilled, rendering post-export conditions irrelevant. The Commissioner&#039;s authority was limited to cases exceeding license limits, and the Tribunal&#039;s decisions were upheld regarding jurisdiction and estoppel principles. Consequently, fines and penalties under Sections 111(o) and 112(a) were set aside, and the civil miscellaneous appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>