https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210815 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision classifying Aluminium Hydroxide Gel (AHG) under sub-heading 2818.10 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. It found the extended period under Section 11A applicable due to the appellants' misclassification, non-payment of duty, and misleading information. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the duty demand and emphasizing the significance of accurate classification and compliance to avoid penalties and extended limitation periods. en-us Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210815 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner's decision classifying Aluminium Hydroxide Gel (AHG) under sub-heading 2818.10 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. It found the extended period under Section 11A applicable due to the appellants' misclassification, non-payment of duty, and misleading information. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the duty demand and emphasizing the significance of accurate classification and compliance to avoid penalties and extended limitation periods. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210815