<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1126 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210812</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the denial of benefits under Notification No. 6/2006. The Tribunal emphasized that mistakenly claiming a benefit under the wrong statutory provision should not result in denial of the benefit if the party is lawfully entitled to it under another provision. As the denial in this case was solely based on the retrospective claim under a different notification without other grounds mentioned in the Show Cause Notice, the Tribunal granted a total waiver of the amount demanded until the appeal&#039;s disposal, ensuring the appellant was not unfairly penalized for a procedural error.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1126 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210812</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the denial of benefits under Notification No. 6/2006. The Tribunal emphasized that mistakenly claiming a benefit under the wrong statutory provision should not result in denial of the benefit if the party is lawfully entitled to it under another provision. As the denial in this case was solely based on the retrospective claim under a different notification without other grounds mentioned in the Show Cause Notice, the Tribunal granted a total waiver of the amount demanded until the appeal&#039;s disposal, ensuring the appellant was not unfairly penalized for a procedural error.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>