<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 380 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210805</link>
    <description>The Madras High Court upheld the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of Notification Number 10/1997-C.E. regarding caustic soda flakes and trichloroethylene. The court found no irregularity in the interpretation, emphasizing the correct application of provisions. It clarified the classification of goods cleared with and without duty payment under Notification No. 19/97-C.E. The court highlighted the requirement for clear distinction between dutiable and exempted products under Rule 57CC(1), dismissing the civil miscellaneous appeal and affirming the interpretation of notifications and classification of final products for excise duty purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 10:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 380 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210805</link>
      <description>The Madras High Court upheld the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of Notification Number 10/1997-C.E. regarding caustic soda flakes and trichloroethylene. The court found no irregularity in the interpretation, emphasizing the correct application of provisions. It clarified the classification of goods cleared with and without duty payment under Notification No. 19/97-C.E. The court highlighted the requirement for clear distinction between dutiable and exempted products under Rule 57CC(1), dismissing the civil miscellaneous appeal and affirming the interpretation of notifications and classification of final products for excise duty purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>