<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 398 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210794</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for AY 2003-04 and AY 2004-05, upholding the inclusion of Clingene International Pvt. Ltd. as a comparable company, the non-requirement of Arm&#039;s Length Price adjustments due to the safe harbor rule, and the deletion of interest disallowance on an interest-free loan to Monsanto India Ltd. The Tribunal stressed the significance of functional comparability and commercial expediency in transfer pricing and interest disallowance matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 398 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210794</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for AY 2003-04 and AY 2004-05, upholding the inclusion of Clingene International Pvt. Ltd. as a comparable company, the non-requirement of Arm&#039;s Length Price adjustments due to the safe harbor rule, and the deletion of interest disallowance on an interest-free loan to Monsanto India Ltd. The Tribunal stressed the significance of functional comparability and commercial expediency in transfer pricing and interest disallowance matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>