<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1197 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210782</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI addressed liability for unpaid service tax, penalties under the Finance Act, 1994, and the interpretation of Section 80. The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, emphasizing the relevance of circumstances and reasonable cause in penalty imposition. It allowed the appeal, setting aside penalty imposition and providing relief to the appellants based on legal provisions and the original authority&#039;s discretion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1197 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210782</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI addressed liability for unpaid service tax, penalties under the Finance Act, 1994, and the interpretation of Section 80. The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, emphasizing the relevance of circumstances and reasonable cause in penalty imposition. It allowed the appeal, setting aside penalty imposition and providing relief to the appellants based on legal provisions and the original authority&#039;s discretion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210782</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>