https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210771 The Tribunal upheld the order granting the appellant a refund of Rs. 5,35,500, as they had paid twice for the same transaction. The decision to allow the refund through CENVAT credit was upheld based on precedent. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's claim for CENVAT credit payment, citing their acceptance of cash payment liability without protest. Interest for delayed payment was deemed justified and not subject to refund. The original decision was upheld, while the contradictory order was set aside, resulting in the disposal of the appeals. en-us Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jul 2014 16:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210771 The Tribunal upheld the order granting the appellant a refund of Rs. 5,35,500, as they had paid twice for the same transaction. The decision to allow the refund through CENVAT credit was upheld based on precedent. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's claim for CENVAT credit payment, citing their acceptance of cash payment liability without protest. Interest for delayed payment was deemed justified and not subject to refund. The original decision was upheld, while the contradictory order was set aside, resulting in the disposal of the appeals. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210771