https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210770 The Tribunal remanded the case to assess unjust enrichment for a refund claim initially rejected but later approved by CESTAT. The Commissioner (Appeals) orders were set aside due to conflicting decisions, and the appeal for interest on delayed refund was rejected as the refund was issued within the required timeframe. The department's appeal for verification of duty burden passed on to customers was allowed, and the matter was remanded for proper examination of invoices. en-us Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210770 The Tribunal remanded the case to assess unjust enrichment for a refund claim initially rejected but later approved by CESTAT. The Commissioner (Appeals) orders were set aside due to conflicting decisions, and the appeal for interest on delayed refund was rejected as the refund was issued within the required timeframe. The department's appeal for verification of duty burden passed on to customers was allowed, and the matter was remanded for proper examination of invoices. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210770