https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210768 The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the Deputy Commissioner's order and holding that the petitioner was entitled to the central excise exemption under Notification No. 50/2003. A mandamus was issued to grant the exemption to the petitioner's unit, with each party bearing its own costs. The court emphasized that the petitioner met the criteria for exemption based on the clear terms of the notification, disregarding arguments related to legitimate expectation and promissory estoppel. en-us Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Feb 2012 05:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210768 The court allowed the writ petition, quashing the Deputy Commissioner's order and holding that the petitioner was entitled to the central excise exemption under Notification No. 50/2003. A mandamus was issued to grant the exemption to the petitioner's unit, with each party bearing its own costs. The court emphasized that the petitioner met the criteria for exemption based on the clear terms of the notification, disregarding arguments related to legitimate expectation and promissory estoppel. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210768