https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210765 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving central excise duty liability, eligibility of Modvat credit based on a Chartered Accountant's certificate, and compliance with Modvat/Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal held that the Revenue incorrectly invoked limitation and directed the appellant to discharge duty for a specific period. It upheld the benefit of Modvat credit for the appellant, as the Revenue did not challenge the certificate or provide contrary evidence. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal, affirming the correctness and legality of the impugned order. en-us Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210765 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving central excise duty liability, eligibility of Modvat credit based on a Chartered Accountant's certificate, and compliance with Modvat/Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal held that the Revenue incorrectly invoked limitation and directed the appellant to discharge duty for a specific period. It upheld the benefit of Modvat credit for the appellant, as the Revenue did not challenge the certificate or provide contrary evidence. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's appeal, affirming the correctness and legality of the impugned order. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210765