https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210763 The Court directed the Tribunal to provide a detailed statement of facts for consideration regarding the manufacturer's double availing of Modvat credit under Rule 57G. The Court emphasized the need for a comprehensive examination of the job worker raising an invoice under Rule 52A and the legality of the job worker paying duty on credit inputs. The Department challenged the double credit availed by the assessee on the same inputs, seeking clarification on the legality of availing two benefits for a single transaction. The Court directed the Tribunal to provide a detailed statement of facts for a thorough examination before the Court. en-us Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210763 The Court directed the Tribunal to provide a detailed statement of facts for consideration regarding the manufacturer's double availing of Modvat credit under Rule 57G. The Court emphasized the need for a comprehensive examination of the job worker raising an invoice under Rule 52A and the legality of the job worker paying duty on credit inputs. The Department challenged the double credit availed by the assessee on the same inputs, seeking clarification on the legality of availing two benefits for a single transaction. The Court directed the Tribunal to provide a detailed statement of facts for a thorough examination before the Court. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 10 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210763