https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210741 Failure to comply with a Tribunal-imposed pre-deposit condition for stay can result in dismissal of the appeal, where no deposit evidence or representation is made on the compliance date. In service tax matters, Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies through Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, so non-compliance with the deposit requirement has operative consequences for the maintainability of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed for breach of the stay order condition. en-us Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210741 Failure to comply with a Tribunal-imposed pre-deposit condition for stay can result in dismissal of the appeal, where no deposit evidence or representation is made on the compliance date. In service tax matters, Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies through Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, so non-compliance with the deposit requirement has operative consequences for the maintainability of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed for breach of the stay order condition. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210741