<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 242 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210738</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case concerning the classification of &#039;Electronic Automatic Regulators.&#039; The Court upheld the classification under Chapter sub-heading 9032.89 based on a Notification issued by the Central Government. As the goods fell under this classification from 01.03.2002, the appeal was disposed of without awarding costs, affirming the classification under Chapter sub-heading 9032.89 post the specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 242 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210738</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case concerning the classification of &#039;Electronic Automatic Regulators.&#039; The Court upheld the classification under Chapter sub-heading 9032.89 based on a Notification issued by the Central Government. As the goods fell under this classification from 01.03.2002, the appeal was disposed of without awarding costs, affirming the classification under Chapter sub-heading 9032.89 post the specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>