<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 410 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210733</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, emphasizing the lack of substantial evidence and independent corroboration to prove allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal of final products. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, highlighting the importance of concrete evidence in excise-related matters and the need for a robust evidentiary basis to establish guilt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 410 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210733</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, emphasizing the lack of substantial evidence and independent corroboration to prove allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal of final products. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, highlighting the importance of concrete evidence in excise-related matters and the need for a robust evidentiary basis to establish guilt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>