<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 408 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210731</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by setting aside the personal penalty imposed on the appellant for taking cenvat credit on allegedly fake invoices. The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the original adjudicating authority for fresh consideration, following principles of natural justice and in line with a previous judgment that had set aside the original order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 408 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210731</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by setting aside the personal penalty imposed on the appellant for taking cenvat credit on allegedly fake invoices. The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the original adjudicating authority for fresh consideration, following principles of natural justice and in line with a previous judgment that had set aside the original order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>