<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 867 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210725</link>
    <description>Modvat/Cenvat credit may be sustained where invoice copies are supported by departmental verification of the supplier&#039;s records and that factual verification is not disputed. Here, the Range Superintendent had verified the invoices, the verification was accepted on the record, and the Tribunal treated the documents as reliable evidence for credit. As the challenge turned on a factual dispute rather than a distinct question of law, no legal error was shown in accepting the verified invoices and allowing the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 10:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 867 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210725</link>
      <description>Modvat/Cenvat credit may be sustained where invoice copies are supported by departmental verification of the supplier&#039;s records and that factual verification is not disputed. Here, the Range Superintendent had verified the invoices, the verification was accepted on the record, and the Tribunal treated the documents as reliable evidence for credit. As the challenge turned on a factual dispute rather than a distinct question of law, no legal error was shown in accepting the verified invoices and allowing the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>