<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 783 - Delhi High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210707</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the interest earned by the assessee from M/s. SWC was not chargeable to interest-tax under section 5 of the Interest-tax Act as the transaction was deemed a &quot;deposit&quot; and not a &quot;loan.&quot; The amount given to M/s. SWC was also held to be a deposit and not a loan, based on evidence and judicial precedents. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) had treated the transaction as a loan, but the Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, resulting in a favorable outcome for the assessee, with the appeal being dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 783 - Delhi High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210707</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the interest earned by the assessee from M/s. SWC was not chargeable to interest-tax under section 5 of the Interest-tax Act as the transaction was deemed a &quot;deposit&quot; and not a &quot;loan.&quot; The amount given to M/s. SWC was also held to be a deposit and not a loan, based on evidence and judicial precedents. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) had treated the transaction as a loan, but the Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, resulting in a favorable outcome for the assessee, with the appeal being dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>