<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 256 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210700</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the CLB&#039;s decision to allow applications without notice to the appellant. The court emphasized the preliminary nature of the findings and the appellant&#039;s right to challenge the claims made by the petitioners before final conclusions are reached. The court also clarified that notice is not required at the initial stage of impleadment, as established in previous legal precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 07:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 256 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210700</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming the CLB&#039;s decision to allow applications without notice to the appellant. The court emphasized the preliminary nature of the findings and the appellant&#039;s right to challenge the claims made by the petitioners before final conclusions are reached. The court also clarified that notice is not required at the initial stage of impleadment, as established in previous legal precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>