<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 399 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210695</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order denying a refund claim, remanding the matter back to the adjudicating authority to reexamine the issue of unjust enrichment as directed in a previous order. The Tribunal deemed the issuance of a fresh show cause notice unnecessary, leading to the disposal of the appeal and stay application after the waiver of predeposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 399 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210695</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order denying a refund claim, remanding the matter back to the adjudicating authority to reexamine the issue of unjust enrichment as directed in a previous order. The Tribunal deemed the issuance of a fresh show cause notice unnecessary, leading to the disposal of the appeal and stay application after the waiver of predeposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>