<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 397 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210693</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for interest and penalties under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act due to discrepancies between the Daily Production Report and RG.1 Register for Piperazine. It found that the entries in the report were rough estimates, supported by the nature of the manufacturing process, where solidification caused discrepancies. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s explanation, noting consistent higher entries in the RG.1 Register, indicating rough estimates. Consequently, the demand was deemed unsustainable, leading to the allowance of the appeal and the reversal of the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2015 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 397 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210693</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand for interest and penalties under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act due to discrepancies between the Daily Production Report and RG.1 Register for Piperazine. It found that the entries in the report were rough estimates, supported by the nature of the manufacturing process, where solidification caused discrepancies. The Tribunal accepted the appellant&#039;s explanation, noting consistent higher entries in the RG.1 Register, indicating rough estimates. Consequently, the demand was deemed unsustainable, leading to the allowance of the appeal and the reversal of the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>