<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 217 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210687</link>
    <description>The Special Bench held that the sum of Rs. 11 crores accrued to the assessee under the non-compete agreement dated 27/10/1999 but was not assessable as capital gains for the assessment year 2000-01. The payment was for refraining from business activities and fell under Section 28(va)(a) of the Income Tax Act, applicable from 1-4-2003. Therefore, the sum received was considered a capital receipt and not taxable as capital gains. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 14:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 217 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210687</link>
      <description>The Special Bench held that the sum of Rs. 11 crores accrued to the assessee under the non-compete agreement dated 27/10/1999 but was not assessable as capital gains for the assessment year 2000-01. The payment was for refraining from business activities and fell under Section 28(va)(a) of the Income Tax Act, applicable from 1-4-2003. Therefore, the sum received was considered a capital receipt and not taxable as capital gains. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>