<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 763 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210672</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the issue of disallowance under Section 14A back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, noting that Rule 8D was not applicable for the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) and for prior year expenses, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 09:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 763 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210672</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the issue of disallowance under Section 14A back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, noting that Rule 8D was not applicable for the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of disallowances under Section 40(a)(ia) and for prior year expenses, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>