<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 392 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210670</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court modified the deposit amount required from the appellant under Sections 83 and 35F of the Finance Act, 1994 and the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite the substantial payment made towards service tax dues, the Court directed the appellant to deposit a reduced sum within a specified timeframe to balance the dues and penalty. Failure to comply would result in legal consequences. The Court disposed of the appeal without awarding costs, concluding the proceedings related to the waiver of predeposit concerning service tax liabilities and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 392 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210670</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court modified the deposit amount required from the appellant under Sections 83 and 35F of the Finance Act, 1994 and the Central Excise Act, 1944. Despite the substantial payment made towards service tax dues, the Court directed the appellant to deposit a reduced sum within a specified timeframe to balance the dues and penalty. Failure to comply would result in legal consequences. The Court disposed of the appeal without awarding costs, concluding the proceedings related to the waiver of predeposit concerning service tax liabilities and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>