<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 692 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210668</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders confirming the demand of service tax were set aside. The Tribunal held that the show-cause notices issued during the impugned period were not sustainable, leading to the demands being deemed unsustainable as well. The Tribunal referred to relevant case laws and legal provisions to support its decision, ultimately providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 692 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210668</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders confirming the demand of service tax were set aside. The Tribunal held that the show-cause notices issued during the impugned period were not sustainable, leading to the demands being deemed unsustainable as well. The Tribunal referred to relevant case laws and legal provisions to support its decision, ultimately providing consequential relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>