<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 862 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210652</link>
    <description>The Government upheld the rejection of the rebate claims, concluding that the applicant did not comply with the necessary procedural and substantive requirements. The revision application was rejected for lacking merit, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 862 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210652</link>
      <description>The Government upheld the rejection of the rebate claims, concluding that the applicant did not comply with the necessary procedural and substantive requirements. The revision application was rejected for lacking merit, affirming the decisions of the lower authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>