<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 829 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210647</link>
    <description>The court held that the petitioner successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 138A of the Customs Act and proved that he did not have conscious possession of the contraband. Consequently, the conviction and sentence of the petitioner under Section 135(1)(i) of the Act were set aside, and he was acquitted of the charge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 12:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 829 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210647</link>
      <description>The court held that the petitioner successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 138A of the Customs Act and proved that he did not have conscious possession of the contraband. Consequently, the conviction and sentence of the petitioner under Section 135(1)(i) of the Act were set aside, and he was acquitted of the charge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210647</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>