<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 191 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210638</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, granting the appellant another opportunity to explain bank deposits and withdrawals before the Assessing Officer. Emphasizing procedural fairness, the Tribunal warned against unnecessary adjournments. The decision marked a partial success for the appellant in contesting the additions and procedural issues in the assessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 191 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210638</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, granting the appellant another opportunity to explain bank deposits and withdrawals before the Assessing Officer. Emphasizing procedural fairness, the Tribunal warned against unnecessary adjournments. The decision marked a partial success for the appellant in contesting the additions and procedural issues in the assessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>