<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 188 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210635</link>
    <description>Interest from deposits with banks or other third parties does not retain mutual character, so the mutuality principle is unavailable on that component; deduction under section 80P(2)(d) also depends on verification that the interest arose from investments with another co-operative society or co-operative bank, and the matter required factual inquiry. Transfer fee collection turns on whether the levy was authorised by the society&#039;s bye-laws and remained within mutual limits, so that issue was remanded for verification. Amounts collected as an infrastructure fund for use of additional FSI were treated as covered by mutuality because they were member contributions linked to common facilities, and were not taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 188 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210635</link>
      <description>Interest from deposits with banks or other third parties does not retain mutual character, so the mutuality principle is unavailable on that component; deduction under section 80P(2)(d) also depends on verification that the interest arose from investments with another co-operative society or co-operative bank, and the matter required factual inquiry. Transfer fee collection turns on whether the levy was authorised by the society&#039;s bye-laws and remained within mutual limits, so that issue was remanded for verification. Amounts collected as an infrastructure fund for use of additional FSI were treated as covered by mutuality because they were member contributions linked to common facilities, and were not taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>