<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 748 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210626</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. The reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 were deemed invalid due to lack of concrete evidence and vague reasons. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of clear findings and concrete evidence in penalty and reassessment proceedings, highlighting that suspicion alone is insufficient to justify such actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184059" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 748 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210626</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. The reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 were deemed invalid due to lack of concrete evidence and vague reasons. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of clear findings and concrete evidence in penalty and reassessment proceedings, highlighting that suspicion alone is insufficient to justify such actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>