<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 179 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210624</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, upheld the inclusion of incidental and ancillary expenses in the assessable value of C &amp;amp; F services based on a precedent set by a Larger Bench decision. The Tribunal granted partial relief to the appellant by waiving the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the uncertain legal landscape at the time of assessment, while confirming the penalty under Section 77.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184057" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 179 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210624</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, upheld the inclusion of incidental and ancillary expenses in the assessable value of C &amp;amp; F services based on a precedent set by a Larger Bench decision. The Tribunal granted partial relief to the appellant by waiving the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the uncertain legal landscape at the time of assessment, while confirming the penalty under Section 77.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210624</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>