<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 684 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210622</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, citing a legal precedent that service tax is not payable for services rendered outside India during the period in question (1999-2002). The decision was based on established legal positions confirmed by higher courts, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the setting aside of the demand by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2018 16:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 684 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210622</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, citing a legal precedent that service tax is not payable for services rendered outside India during the period in question (1999-2002). The decision was based on established legal positions confirmed by higher courts, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the setting aside of the demand by the Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>