<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 176 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210615</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, remanded the case to the Commissioner(Appeals) for quantifying the amount of Cenvat Credit to be reversed for exempted electricity used in the final product. The appellants were directed to present their case at the adjudicating authority level to ensure accurate quantification, emphasizing the importance of maintaining separate records for Cenvat Credit on common inputs. The Tribunal highlighted the legal requirement for proper quantification and referenced a previous decision to support the sufficiency of the credit reversal as per the law. The appeal was disposed of with an emphasis on correct quantification for a fair resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 176 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210615</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, remanded the case to the Commissioner(Appeals) for quantifying the amount of Cenvat Credit to be reversed for exempted electricity used in the final product. The appellants were directed to present their case at the adjudicating authority level to ensure accurate quantification, emphasizing the importance of maintaining separate records for Cenvat Credit on common inputs. The Tribunal highlighted the legal requirement for proper quantification and referenced a previous decision to support the sufficiency of the credit reversal as per the law. The appeal was disposed of with an emphasis on correct quantification for a fair resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>