<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 170 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210605</link>
    <description>The appeals for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07 were partly allowed. The disallowance of foreign tour expenses and certain labor charges was upheld, while the treatment of factory repairing expenses as revenue expenditure was allowed. The appellant&#039;s claim for disallowance on account of personal use was dismissed. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on the lack of sufficient evidence to support the business nature of the expenses in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 170 - ITAT RAJKOT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210605</link>
      <description>The appeals for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07 were partly allowed. The disallowance of foreign tour expenses and certain labor charges was upheld, while the treatment of factory repairing expenses as revenue expenditure was allowed. The appellant&#039;s claim for disallowance on account of personal use was dismissed. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were based on the lack of sufficient evidence to support the business nature of the expenses in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>